Paper: Evaluating And Comparing Three Text-Production Techniques

ACL ID C96-1043
Title Evaluating And Comparing Three Text-Production Techniques
Venue International Conference on Computational Linguistics
Session Main Conference
Year 1996
Authors

What al+c the benefits of ttsing Natural [~anguagc (;cneratio,t in an industrial apl+lication? We have attempt t<) answer part (}f this qttcsti}n with at descripti(}n of an assessment {}f three techniques for producing multiscntcntial text: senti- atutomatic fill-in-lhc-blank interfacing, automalic linguistic-and-tcmphltes hybrid generation, and hunlall writing. This asscssIllol]l used a black b(}x motlmdology, with ain independetlt blind- tested jury that gave difforent quality levels in relation to a sot o1' criteria. The texts used for tile assessliicnt wcfc business reply letters.